Greenpeace urges legal ban to tackle problem after finding that top personal care companies fell short on commitments, writes Damian Carrington
Microplastics in the Azores. Campaigners say microbeads are the easiest type of this pollution to tackle. Photograph: Peter Charaf/RaceforWater
Loopholes in the voluntary pledges by the biggest personal care
companies to phase out polluting microbeads have been revealed in a report from Greenpeace, which says a legal ban is needed.
Tiny plastic beads are widely used in toiletries and cosmetics but
thousands of tonnes wash into the sea every year, where they harm
wildlife and can ultimately be eaten by people, with unknown effects on
health. A petition signed by more than 300,000 people
asking for a UK ban was delivered to the prime minister in June A US
law banning microbeads was passed at the end of 2015.
The Greenpeace report surveyed the world’s top 30 personal care
companies and found that even those ranked highest came up short of the
standard they deemed acceptable.
One of the leaders, Colgate-Palmolive, said it stopped using of plastic microbeads at the end of 2014,
but Greenpeace said the pledge only applied to products used for
“exfoliating and cleansing”. Microbeads can be used in moisturisers,
makeup, lip balms, shaving foams and other products.
Microbeads are so small that they will not be filtered by sewage systems. Photograph: Vanessa Miles/Greenpeace
One of the lowest-ranked companies was Estée Lauder, which says it “is
currently in the process of removing exfoliating plastic beads in the
small number of our products that contain them”. Greenpeace said the
company’s commitment is too narrow, applying only to microbeads used for
exfoliating, and does not set a deadline.
The lowest-ranked company was US-based Edgewell Personal Care. It was
given a score of zero out of 400 by Greenpeace, as “they did not respond
to the survey and no publicly available information was found”.
However, an Edgewell spokeswoman said: “We did not participate in the
Greenpeace survey, as we do not incorporate the use of microbeads in any
of our wide range of personal care products.”
The world’s biggest personal care company, Procter & Gamble, was
ranked joint 18th. The company, whose brands include Olay, says its “goal is to remove polyethylene microbeads from
all our cleansers and toothpastes by 2017”. Greenpeace said the
commitment was unacceptable because it applies to just one type of
plastic, rather than all types, and applies only to personal cleansing
and oral care products.
Other loopholes in company pledges include not committing to phasing out
microbeads in all countries, being unclear about the size of the
microbeads excluded and allowing the use of “biodegradable” plastic
microbeads, despite such materials being labelled as a false solution by the chief scientist at the UN Environment Programme.
Louise Edge, a senior oceans campaigner at Greenpeace UK, said: “When it
comes to dealing with microbeads, companies are all over the shop,”
said Louise Edge, senior oceans campaigner at Greenpeace UK.
Mary Creagh, the chair of the cross-party environmental audit committee
of MPs, which will publish its inquiry into the issue in the summer,
said: “Cosmetics companies’ voluntary approach to phasing out plastic
microbeads is inconsistent and confusing for consumers. Most customers
would be horrified to discover the effect their facial scrubs are having
on the marine environment.”
Daniel Steadman, from Fauna & Flora International, which produces The Good Scrub Guide,
said: “When you get down into the details of these brands’ microbead
commitments, the potential for confusion is enormous. Marine life can be
harmed by any type of plastic reaching our oceans, so if it’s a solid, a
plastic and in a product that goes down the drain, it shouldn’t be
there.”
Christopher Flower, the director-general of the UK’s Cosmetic Toiletry and Perfumery Association,
said: “The cosmetics industry is taking this issue extremely seriously
and is very much aware of its responsibilities to its customers and the
environment.”
He said the European personal care association, Cosmetics Europe, has issued arecommendation to
end the use of “synthetic, solid plastic particles used for exfoliating
and cleansing that are non-biodegradable in the marine environment” by
2020.
“We believe that this course of action will have an impact far more
quickly than waiting for any legislative ban,” said Flower He added that
most microbeads are likely to have been phased out long before 2020.
Microbeads are too small to be filtered effectively by sewage treatment
plants and flow into the oceans. Plastic pollution in the oceans is a
huge problem: 5tn pieces of plastic are
floating in the world’s seas. Microbeads are a small but significant
part of this, which campaigners argue are the easiest to deal with.
The beads are thought to be eaten by people consuming seafood and possibly breathed in too. Safe alternatives are already available, including ground nutshells, pumice, sugar and salt.
Toothpaste containing microbeads. Small plastic
particles such as these are used in many cosmetic products. Photograph:
Georg Mayer/Greenpeace
This article was originally published by the Guardian and reprinted here with permission.
Donald Trump and America’s moral authority: Republican candidate s argument that the US cannot be a model for the world because of its domestic problems was made during the early years of the Cold War by Soviet propagandists
Like
other countries, China faces challenges in its shift to low-carbon
electricity. One major problem is “curtailment,” which means power grids
do not use renewable power even when wind and solar power plants are
capable of producing it. Close to 10% of solar capacity remained untapped during the first half of 2015, while around 15% of
wind power was wasted throughout the year. In regions such as Gansu,
Ningxia, Heilongjiang, Xinjiang and Yunnan, the situation is a lot
worse.
China’s
Renewable Energy Law prohibits curtailment, but the problem persists,
partly for technical reasons. However, a large part of the problem is
not technical. In practice, fossil fuel power plants have priority over
renewables, leaving less room for solar and wind power in a country with
a large overcapacity of coal-fired power. There is also a lack of
clarity on how the renewable energy integration mandate should be
enforced. Better-designed and -implemented policies can help.
The 1-2-3 Punch
In the last two months, China’s government has thrown three punches to tackle the problem.
The
central government has ordered 13 provinces to suspend coal-fired power
plant approvals in the current pipeline, and another 15 provinces to
delay new construction of projects that have already been approved,
according to media reports. The government has also set up an on-going
early warning mechanism to anticipate and discourage local decisions
that may exacerbate coal power plant overcapacity in the future.
Projecting to 2019, the government has issued a “red alert” for 28 provinces (in Chinese),
asking local authorities to suspend approval and companies to
reconsider investment. By curbing the development of new coal power
plants, the dominant source of fossil fuel electricity in China, the
government aims to prevent destructive competition with renewables.
Punch 2: Management rules to guarantee sale of renewable energy generation on the grid
The
management rules issued in March set an annual minimum purchase
guarantee for wind and utility-scale solar generation, securing the
recovery of cost and reasonable profit for those projects. For the first
time, the management rules stipulate that renewable energy power plants
be compensated by fossil fuel plants that squeeze out their share of
guaranteed purchase, making it costly for fossil fuel plants to generate
electricity that should have come from renewable sources.
Above the guaranteed purchase level, renewables are
encouraged to participate in the generation market with competitive
pricing. Since renewables have low marginal generation costs, the move
can further boost renewable generation. Other renewables, such as
biomass, geothermal, wave and distributed solar power, have guaranteed
purchase for all of their generation.
The directive also lays out roles and responsibilities for central and
local regulators, fossil fuel and renewable power plants, and grid
companies, providing the clarity needed for robust enforcement.
This is a decisive step towards the establishment of a green dispatch system
that gives priority dispatching to renewable, efficient and low-carbon
sources, which was called for by President Xi Jinping in a joint
US-China presidential statement on climate change last September.
Punch 3: Consumption and generation targets for renewables.
New government guidance
sets minimum electricity consumption targets for non-hydro renewable
energy (solar, wind, biomass, geothermal, wave and tidal energy etc.)
Thirty-one provinces now have consumption targets ranging from 5% to
13% by 2020, creating incentives for local authorities to integrate
renewables.
At
the same time, the directive requires power companies to generate at
least 9% of electricity from non-hydro renewable sources by 2020, almost
doubling the generation share in five years. It also states the
intention to develop a Renewable Energy Certificates trading scheme,
where power companies can sell or purchase renewable energy as a way to
comply with the above-mentioned requirement.
Source:
2010-2014 data from China Electricity Council; 2015 data from
Statistical Communique 2015, National Statistic Bureau; 2020 requirement
from National Energy Administration.
Moving towards high renewable energy penetration
Taken together, the latest actions are a significant step to see that
less renewable energy is wasted in China. They also reflect the
government’s attempt to tap into the power of the market to address the
challenge.
To knock down the problem, the government needs to closely monitor and
evaluate the implementation and effectiveness of these measures, and if
needed, strengthen them decisively. The government has shown an awareness of the need for stronger environmental policy enforcement, and has begun to take steps in this direction.
Going beyond the 2030 target, a group of China’s top energy experts concludes China has a fighting chance to achieve high renewable energy penetration,
where renewable energy accounts for over 60% of primary energy
consumption and 85% of electricity consumption by 2050. It can happen
only if China implements aggressive policies to back renewable energy at
every turn. The latest developments give reason to believe that China
may be on the road to the heavyweight championship.
This article was originally published here by the World Resources Institute.
Faster electricity market reform is needed to harness more wind and speed up a shift from coal, two experts tell chinadialogue
Workers install a wind turbine at Chicheng Wind Farm. The
farm is located in Hebei Province, an area which is rich in wind energy
resources. (Image by Simon Lim / Greenpeace) China
has roughly one third of global installed wind energy capacity, while
the US has 17%. Yet China uses less wind-powered electricity than the
US. What is going wrong?
Energy market structures and politics limit the uptake of wind energy by
the grid, according to renewable energy specialists. Two of them shared
their views with chinadialogue to explain what is causing the problem, and put forward solutions.
Michael Davidson
is a researcher at Massachusetts Institute of Technology specialising
in renewable energy utilisation, while Tsinghua University lecturer Ning Zhang researches power system planning.
chinadialogue (CD): What is China doing to promote wind energy integration from a policy standpoint and how does it rank globally?
MichaelDavidson(MD):
China has put in place polices to develop wind energy since the 2006
Renewable Energy Law, but actual generation of electricity from wind
falls short of expectations, given its high capacity. By 2010, many
regions started experiencing high levels of “curtailment”;
when wind energy is available but the grid operator instructs wind
farms not to put all of it onto the grid, effectively wasting it.
Many
countries with high levels of wind energy deployment experience
curtailment. Texas, prior to 2012, experienced some of the highest rates
outside of China, though they have now declined to near-zero (see
diagram). As part of the joint US-China statements on climate change
before the Paris talks, President Xi Jinping announced that the country
would develop “green power dispatch” to improve wind integration on the grid. China has also pledged to obtain 20% of power from non-fossil fuels by 2030.
NZ:
The government primarily supports wind power through subsidies and an
acquisition mechanism. In 2003, when wind farms were first set up, the
government set a price for wind energy that guaranteed a return on
investment. As wind farms became more widespread in 2009, China enacted a
“feed in tariff,” a guaranteed fixed purchase price at which the grid
would buy electricity. The National Renewable Energy Fund pays the
difference between the energy grid companies’ purchasing prices and the
“feed in tariff,” to encourage wind energy use.
CD:
What are the roadblocks to greater wind integration in China? What are
the technical vs. the political challenges, especially those that are
unique to China?
MD:
Curtailment is often attributed to “technical” challenges, such as
managing the variability of wind power, and mismatches between the
location of wind farms, demand centres, and the grid.
However, many of these are better thought of as “techno-economic” challenges, because they are determined by the costs
of addressing certain technical limitations. For example, the cost of a
coal plant producing at less than its installed capacity, so that more
wind energy can be integrated into the grid.
MD:
For China, all of the traditional technical issues are relevant. But in
addition, China’s electricity sector is operated under a number of
other political constraints that exacerbate techno-economic challenges.
Because electricity prices are fixed by the central government, they do
not respond to changes in supply, such as the availability of wind, or
the costs of increasing and decreasing coal generation. Instead, the
grid operator administratively determines the coal plant’s minimum
output level in advance, which is typically high.
NZ:
The technical challenges are that electricity cannot be stored on a
large-scale, and generators fail to adjust in real time to changing
supply and demand. One of our experiments, looking at two consecutive
weeks of the energy grid in Inner Mongolia, revealed that wastage
of wind energy mainly occurred at night.
Transmission
congestion is another issue. At present, there is a great deal of
abandoned wind power in the Jilin and Zhangbei areas because of network
congestion.
The fundamental reason is that the national grid focused on the
construction of ultra high voltage (UHV, 1000kV) networks, ignoring the
construction of the 220kV and 500kV network connecting wind power to the
grid. Currently, most of the bottleneck lies in the 220kV transmission
line. Figure 2 summarises the main reasons for abandoning wind in
several provinces.
Lastly,
there is a big problem with the market mechanism for integrating wind
power. Prices, and output, for thermal, hydropower, and gas are
formulated by the government. Wind and thermal prices are identical, and
there is no penalty for wasted wind energy. As wind farms lack any
price advantage over thermal power, grid corporations have no motivation
to capture the excess capacity on windy days. Rather, energy
dispatching centres usually set the maximum amount of wind energy a day
ahead of time, at a level fixed quite low due to the variability of the
wind energy supply.
CD: What would make the system more efficient?
MD: Proposed power sector reforms in State Council Document No. 9,
revived in 2015 after a decade-long hiatus, highlight important avenues
to raise efficiency and improve integration of renewables. Two
proposals, reducing the amount of planned wind energy quotas and
gradually allowing market-determined generation tariffs, raised in
Document No. 9 and subsequent documents,
are high on my list. Regulatory changes to bring grid companies more in
line with international best practices are also important to eliminate
conflicts of interest in dispatching power plants.
Recent
work with colleagues showed that if China reduces the minimum output
level of coal plants and makes more frequent and flexible scheduling
decisions, wind alone could reach 14% of primary energy in 2030—almost
three quarters of the way toward its 2030 target [of 20% of power from
non-fossil fuels]. Adding on other low-carbon sources, this means China
could raise its commitment to non-fossil deployment.
NZ:
Changes are needed to allow for more flexibility. China’s wind power
consumption needs a more flexible pricing mechanism, that allows for a
spot market, a short-term market, rather than long term contracts.
Allowing wind farms to make independent pricing decisions would let the
price of electricity better respond to real time changes in supply and
demand and increase their competitiveness.
China’s
current thermal-based power generation structure and large-scale power
transmission makes it hard to accept intermittent power. Increasing more
flexible power supplies such as gas power plants and increasing
multi-energy system integration would help. Presently, different energy
systems are relatively isolated.
CD: What are some of the things you feel
are poorly explained in Chinese and US media discussions on China’s
renewable energy grid integration that you think the public should
know?
MD: One area that could be better explained is the effect of overcapacity. In one stark example, China built 51 gigawatts (GW) of new coal plants
in 2015 despite a decrease in coal use in the electricity sector. Under
a fixed price plan, the outcome is different: the quota must be spread
out to more coal plants, there is pressure to raise the overall quota
and a shrinking the space left over for wind. Stopping coal overcapacity
could open up more opportunities for wind, though it will not address
the other flexibility obstacles to wind energy.
NZ:
Domestic media reports sometimes misunderstand the real cause of low
renewable energy consumption. The root cause of the problem is usually
not technical, but lies in the lack of market mechanisms. Often the
finger is pointed at grid companies and the solution is simply that the
government needs to strengthen policy enforcement of wind power
consumption.
However,
the government releases documents to encourage greater wind consumption
every year, while wind curtailment remains a significant problem. It’s
clear that publishing documents that force grid companies to accommodate
wind power doesn’t work and that more flexible market, price, and
scheduling mechanisms need to be implemented to create incentives for
conventional energy, grid companies, and even consumers to accommodate
more wind power. courtesy"chinadialogue
Brazilian graffiti artist’s campaign to support invisible recyclers has become a global movement
Eleven years ago, graffiti artist Thiago Mundano had his first encounter with one of Brazil’s 800,000 informal waste pickers, or catadores, when he asked for permission to paint the underside of a São Paulo flyover.
“What do you mean you want to vandalise my home?!” said the angry catador, who was sleeping on the pavement.
In order to avoid a conflict the artist quickly responded: “Can I paint
your trash cart? If you don’t like it, I’ll paint over it.” With
permission granted, Mundano not only brought colour to the catador’s
cart, but etched the phrase that would become the mantra for a
successful partnership: “Your trash is my treasure.”
Days later, Mundano received a phone call from a friend saying he had
seen a cart bearing his signature, or “tag”, on the other side of town.
In getting the catador and his work noticed, Mundano realised he was helping someone, he said. He also realised that the carts could be mobile canvases.
Over
the next five years, Mundano and his friends decorated carts with
messages of appreciation for catadores and the environment: “A catador
is worth more than an environment minister,” “My work is honest, how
about yours?” and “For each tonne of cardboard collected, 20 trees are
not cut down”.
"I am... you are... nature" (Photo: Pimp my carroça)
Closer contact with catadores led Mundano to want to do more and Pimp my Carroça (Pimp my trash cart) was born. Mundano and his friends crowd funded an event in the centre of São
Paulo where they repaired and painted carts with graffiti while the
catadores could see doctors, psychologists, barbers, and massage
therapists. According to Mundano, the event aimed to raise awareness of
catadores’ work and give them a sense of self-worth. Pimp my carroça has
since held events all over Brazil and, more recently, in Bogotá,
Colombia.
But
the movement is not limited to Latin America or even developing
countries. Pimp my Carroça has become a huge mobile art exhibition,
extending to the US and Japan, with the potential to reach 20 million catadores worldwide.
Vital service ignored
According to Brazilian government estimates, catadores are responsible
for 90% of recycling that takes place in the country. São Paulo, a
megalopolis of some 12 million inhabitants, produces 18,000 tons of
rubbish per day. Yet it falls on the city’s 20,000 catadores to ensure
that the 1% that is recycled does not go to waste. “Catadores are
invisible workers,” Mundano said, adding that although their vocation is
recognised by the Brazilian Ministry of Labour,
they still lack the most basic equipment necessary for the job. Many
have no rubber-coated gloves, raincoats, reflective tape, mirrors or
horns for their carts. Worse still, catadores have no workers’ rights
and generally face widespread discrimination.
Bispo’s journey
“I was born in the dump. I don’t really remember my father or my mother.
But I remember playing with the toy cars I found at the dump,” Sergio
da Silva Bispo, a São Paulo catador originally from Salvador, told Diálogo Chino. “I ate what I found there. I ended up becoming an alcoholic.”
“The
money that I made selling cans I picked up on the street I spent on
booze. Then one day, I was in a bar in Salvador, and saw an advert on TV
saying that São Paulo was the land of work. I asked the bar owner what I
had to do to move there, and he answered: just start walking,” Bispo
recalls.
Illiterate and with no idea of the distance involved, Bispo walked the
1,846 kilometres between the two cities over 80 days. He moved into one
of the buildings occupied by squatters in the city centre and went back
to collecting aluminium cans, carrying a bag on his back until he could
afford a cart.
Bispo’s charm earned him prominence among the other catadores in the
city centre streets. The Franciscan church and the renowned Getulio Vargas Foundation also took note of Bispo and his group, offering to teach them how to make carts and about workers’ cooperatives.
"Do I look after nature because you destroy it?" (Photo: Pimp my carroça)
They also became well-versed in the environmental importance of recycling. Bispo gave a speech on the catadores’ work at the World Social Forum.
Whilst there, he also learned more about the environment. Bispo
organised his fellow catadores and today heads the collectors’
cooperative Cooper Glicério.
Bispo
calculates that he alone has prevented the felling of 63,190 trees,
saved 244,140 litres of oil and 514,550 kilos of iron ore because of the
paper, card and cans he has collected.
Today, Bispo collects his recyclables in a vehicle dubbed the Kombosa Seletiva and
takes all the material to the cooperative. The 40 members of the
cooperative gather 150 tonnes of recyclable material per month. After
the materials are sorted, they are sold to a large company that treats
the material for reuse.
Spreading the word
With the Pimp My Cart partnership, the catadores have become more
visible and now speak about their work at schools and businesses. “These
are two marginalised professions,” Mundano said, referring also to
graffiti art, “so the union was natural,” said Mundano.
Although the Brazilian government has a law for solid waste and commissioned studies on the potential of catadores, there are no policies to promote working as a catador in the country.
Bispo
said it is vital that everyone involved in the process of recycling
benefits from it, but adds there is still a lot of exploitation.
Middlemen who purchase from individual catadores pay very little and
sell the same product for 100 times the price. Doing away with the
middleman is one of the goals of the group.
Bispo,
who has been to France, Portugal, Chile, and Argentina, is now heading
to the Netherlands to talk about recycling and the environment.
This article was originally published on Diálogo Chino.
The world can learn a lot from Sweden, Norway and Denmark's ambitious targets on carbon, writes author Justin Gerdes
Middelgrunden offshore wind farm (Image by European Wind Energy Association)
Every country on Earth must choose clean energy and quit carbon if
the world is to reach zero net carbon emissions by the end of this
century, as outlined in the Paris Agreement.
Leading the pack in this momentous transition are Nordic nations such as Norway, whose parliament this month voted to become carbon neutral by 2030. “This
is a direct response to the commitments Norway took on by ratifying the
Paris Agreement and means that we will have to step up our climate
action dramatically,” Rasmus Hansson, leader of the Norwegian Green
party in Parliament, told the Guardian after the vote.
Norway has already nearly decarbonised its power supply but it will be
much harder to cut carbon emissions in other sectors. Owing to generous tax, toll, and parking incentives, Norway is a world leader in the deployment of electric vehicles. EVs (including both plug-in hybrid and all-electric models) comprised 29% of new car sales
in May 2016. Officials in Oslo, Norway’s capital and most populous
city, are also working to persuade residents to opt for means other than
cars to get around. On June 23, the City Council voted to ban cars from the city centre by 2019 and approved a plan to slash greenhouse gas emissions by 95% from 1990 levels by 2030.
“A
key part of the plan is to prioritise pedestrians, bicyclists, and
public transport before car traffic, both when it comes to investments
in infrastructure and the use of space,” Lan Marie Nguyen Berg, Oslo’s
vice mayor for the environment, told Climate Home.
The bicycle urbanism experts at Copenhagenize Design Companycall
Oslo’s new bicycle infrastructure plan, which prioritises
Copenhagen-style, curb-separated cycle tracks, “one of the most
interesting and inspiring documents we’ve seen coming out of a
municipality anywhere in the world.”
Under an energy agreement approved by Parliament in March 2012, all sectors – electricity, heating, industry, and transportation – are to be fossil fuel-free by 2050. A plan
approved by the Danish Government in August 2013 added medium-term
targets. It prohibited the use of oil for heating and all uses of coal
by 2030, and stated that the electricity and heating sectors will be
100% renewable by 2035.
Unlike
Norway, Denmark does not have a plentiful and cheap supply of domestic
hydropower. The country is, however, making every effort to harness its
abundant wind resources. The March 2012 energy agreement calls for 50%
of Denmark’s electricity to be supplied by wind turbines by 2020.
In practice, this means Denmark is working to electrify every segment of
the economy – from the power sector to heating to private automobiles.
The predominantly state-owned utility DONG Energy recently invested
US$10.3 million to install Denmark’s largest electric boiler,
which will convert cheap surplus wind electricity into carbon-free heat
for the district heating system in Aarhus, Denmark’s second city.
In
rural areas where homes are not connected to one of Denmark’s district
heating networks, oil-burning furnaces are being replaced with electric
heat pumps. In time, the battery packs in thousands of electric vehicles
will charge with surplus wind power at night.
While Denmark has focused on domestic actions to reduce its emissions, Norway’s just-announced 2030 target relies on EU and international carbon offsets. A looming challenge is the carbon footprint of country’s oil and gas sector.
The 2030 plan does not compel Norway's lucrative oil and gas industry
to make domestic emissions cuts. Legacy fossil fuel assets are also
problematic for Norway's neighbor, Sweden. On July 2, Sweden's
centre-left government approved the sale of
the German lignite (brown coal) assets held by state-owned utility
Vattenfall to Czech utility EPH. Climate campaigners, including Al Gore,
had implored the government to explore ways to keep the coal in the
ground. Instead, Sweden will spend 300 million SEK (US$35.6 million /
308.8 million yuan) annually from 2018-2040 to buy and cancel allowances from the EU's emissions trading system.
Both examples reinforce how difficult it will be to achieve
the climate targets enshrined in the Paris Agreement. After all, when
exported Norwegian oil is consumed in the US or India, for example, the
resulting carbon emissions don't besmirch Norway's carbon totals.
Likewise, the carbon emitted by Vattenfall's lignite-fired power plants
in Germany, accrues to Germany's carbon ledger, not to Sweden's.
Electrification, biofuels, and energy efficiency solutions –
deployed in the Nordic nations and beyond – must succeed in driving down
demand for fossil fuels everywhere. In the end, when counting carbon,
the only numbers that matter are global.
Government and business need to do more to prepare for weather-related havoc, says committee
Climate change has increased the likelihood of last
winter’s devastating floods in the UK by 40%, say scientists at Imperial
College London / (Image by alh1) The
UK will be increasingly exposed to international and domestic risks
from climate change that will cut across almost all areas of policy, a new report warned on July 12.
A study by the UK’s independent advisory body Committee on Climate Change (CCC), released as new prime minister Theresa May
prepared to take occupancy of 10 Downing Street, said government,
business, public services and individuals will need to prepare for the
consequences of extreme weather as the world’s climate warms.
“Delaying
or failing to take appropriate steps will increase the costs and risks
for all UK nations arising from the changing climate,” said Lord Krebs,
chairman of the adaptation sub-committee of the committee on climate
change, in a statement accompanying the report.
In the CCC’s report, which is an update of previous estimates of
adaptation risks, flooding and coastal change is viewed as one of the
main climate hazards to households, businesses and infrastructure.
In the past 12 months the UK has endured serious flooding in northern cities,
while intense bursts of rainfall have inundated electricity substations
and washed away roads and bridges. Such events are expected to become
increasingly frequent, raising major questions about how to reduce the
impacts and assess the economic risks of climate change.
The
report also warns of risks to health, wellbeing and productivity from
increasingly frequent high temperatures, and the impact that extreme
weather will have on public water supply, and the availability of water
for power generation and industry.
Climate change will also have serious consequences for “natural
capital”, such as terrestrial, coastal and marine ecosystems, soils and
biodiversity.
The report also presents some stark warnings on how climate change will
impact populations, economies and livelihoods around the world, which in
turn would have big consequences for the UK, which ranked as the
world’s fifth-largest economy in 2014.
Among
these impacts include loss of life and major humanitarian crises,
disruption to agriculture in a world that is experiencing a big increase
in population, and interference to supply chains, food prices,
international trade and overseas investments
The CCC report cited the example of a US drought in 2012, which
contributed to increasing the price of soya which, in turn, led to some
UK pig farmers being forced out of business.
“Climate change is expected to increase the frequency of weather
extremes, disproportionately affecting low income populations. The UK is
likely to be called upon to provide more resources for humanitarian
assistance, and efforts to build state stability and long-term
resilience could be undermined,” the report said, adding:
“There are uncertain but potentially very significant international
risks arising from climate-related human [migration], and the
possibility of violent inter-state conflict over scarce natural
resources.”
Natural disasters related to climate change, and longer-term trends such
as water stress and desertification, could prompt populations to shift
and migrate in response. While extremes in climate could also mean that
the UK’s overseas aid budget is increasingly used for short-term
disaster response rather than long-term development aid, the report
continues.
The CCC report said it was too early to tell how the UK’s vote to
withdraw from the EU would impact efforts to prepare for the effects of
climate change, “The risks don’t change because of Brexit,”
said Lord Krebs. However, he added: “Some of the legislation that might
underpin our resilience and preparation for future climate changes is
EU legislation and therefore there will be a need in due course to
replace that with national legislation.”
Concerns have also been expressed by one of the CCC report’s authors
that the UK’s withdrawal from the EU will make it harder for the UK to
tackle climate change, as the 28-nation bloc (which it will be until the
UK exits formally) is often more effective when acts together rather
than unilaterally.
courtesy:chinadiakogue
Historian Richard S Newman explores why the “toxic trash heap” became a symbol for citizen activists around the world
"Danger, Hazardous Area" sign as seen through chain link fence at the Love Canal containment zone. (Image by EPA)
“Even
in the 21st century there is still power in the Love Canal brand,”
writes Richard S Newman in his historical account of Love Canal, the
neighbourhood in northern New York where a community built on top of a
chemical dumpsite spurred widespread recognition of the dangers of toxic
waste.
It is the legacy of this Love Canal “brand", Newman
argues, that has enabled this site to shed light on the alarming
consequences of industrial waste, both in the United States and beyond.
Love
Canal is perhaps best known for instigating the 1980 adoption of the
Superfund Act, the first US law to establish means for remediating toxic
waste disposal sites. But why were tens of thousands of gallons of
hazardous chemicals dumped there in the first place? And how did the
residents of Love Canal transform local health concerns into an
environmental movement that influenced national policy, and sparked a
broader discussion of citizens’ environmental rights?
These questions are central to Newman’s meticulously-researched work.
The US historian examines the historical pathways that led to the
tragedy. A key narrative is the rise of industrial development in
America and human exploitation of the environment.
Newman argues, “The Love Canal citizens’ movement was
the first group to challenge this industrial path-dependence; to break
the cycle of disposable land use that had long dominated area politics
and economics.”
The book is split chronologically into three sections: the history of
the Love Canal site and why chemicals were dumped there, how Love Canal
erupted in 1978 into a disaster that merited a national-level response,
and what lessons are to be gleaned from the disaster.
While most commentaries of Love Canal begin when chemicals were buried en
masse in the mid-20th century, Newman begins his account in the 17th
century. He traces how the Niagara region had been eyed as an ideal
environment to be commandeered for economic gain, seducing visionary
William Love to dig the physical canal as part of his attempt to build a
“Model City” before abandoning the project amidst financial troubles
around the turn of the 20th century.
The
same landscape – rich in natural resources and hydroelectric power –
enticed Hooker Chemical Company to locate production there, and later
use Love’s abandoned canal to dump chemical byproducts. Shortly after
the dumpsite was sealed, a suburban neighbourhood was built and
working-class families moved in.
Flash forward to the summer of 1978, when residents began linking health concerns to chemical leachate seeping into groundwater.
Love Canal’s transformation from an isolated incident to a public health
crisis during the summer of 1978 was a direct result of citizens’
efforts to advocate for their right to live in a safe environment.
People held protests that attracted media attention, hosted tours of the
polluted site for officials, and mapped data to illustrate how the site
threatened human health.
Newman argues that Love Canal solidified its
historical role as a symbol for toxic waste “nightmares” when New York’s
head health official declared it necessary to evacuate people from the
site, after succumbing to pressure from aggrieved residents. Moreover,
by framing events not only as a health crisis but as an environmental
disaster, local residents reconfigured America’s environmental movement
to incorporate protection of people as well as places.
Personal stories
Newman’s historical approach highlights humans’ relationship with the environment and how individual
people shaped Love Canal’s legacy. He tells stories that are often
ignored, such as the role of housewives-turned-environmental
activists; the interplay between multiple citizen groups and their
adoption of different tactics to push government for solutions; and the
journalists who kept the case in the national limelight. These
narratives echo factors that continue to influence environmental justice
movements today.
As an
historical analysis, Newman’s book may leave policy wonks
wanting; especially in terms of details of new environmental laws that
followed in the wake of Love Canal, or the incident’s influence on
industrial regulation. For example, though Newman briefly mentions new
information transparency and “right-to-know” laws, a deeper analysis of
these laws, their influence on relationship with NIMBY
movements and citizen activism would have been appreciated. In that
vein, it was interesting to learn how Love Canal activists served as a
key source for disseminating information to other toxic waste victims
across the US in the pre-Internet era, giving rise to the idea of “Love
Canal, USA”: a nation littered with hazardous waste sites.
Toxic legacy lives on
Newman reminds readers that the Love Canal story is not over: over
20,000 tonnes of toxic waste remains buried in the ground. After an old
sewer pipe was removed in 2011, a new round of health-related complaints
erupted, leading to over one thousand claims to be filed by 2014.
Meanwhile, about one quarter
of the US population currently lives within five miles of a Superfund
site, defined as one of the worst 1,000 or so hazardous waste sites
placed on a National Priorities List for long-term cleanup.
Newman’s focus on the legacy of Love Canal and how it persists in
shaping public perception worldwide is certainly relevant for countries
that still lack policies to handle similar events. Most recently,
earlier this year, hundreds of pupils attending a new campus of Changzhou Foreign Languages School,
a top secondary school in China’s Jiangsu province, became ill with
ailments that were quickly linked to pollution from three former
chemical plants situated next to the school.
The media’s labelling of the incident as “China’s
Love Canal” arguably refocused China’s national soil pollution
discussion to the risks of developing former industrial sites, in
addition to just remediating polluted farmland. Though China still lacks
legal procedures for handling soil pollution, in the wake of the
incident, China’s State Council finally released its long-awaited
national Soil Action Plan, and a new Soil Pollution Law is on the legislative agenda for 2017.
Love Canal is very much an American story. Still, Newman’s book
reminds us as new incidents arise to not only consider how to handle
these sites going forward, but to reflect on the deep-rooted historical
causes of these incidents.